Jump to content

The Enduring Legacy Of Michael Collins 100 Years On

From Big Brain Center
Revision as of 12:23, 28 March 2026 by JanetteLomax1 (talk | contribs)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)


21 August 2022
ShareSave


Luke SprouleBBC News NI


"What if Michael Collins had lived?"


That is the question every visitor to the Michael Collins Centre and Museum in Castleview, County Cork, wishes to ask, according to its joint founder Tim Crowley.


Monday marks 100 years considering that Collins was killed in a weapon fight in between contending sides in the Irish Civil War.


A century on, there stays a big interest in "the Big Fella", his function in Irish independence and his long-lasting legacy.


"A lot of our visitors are middle-aged and some have parents and grandparents who were involved 100 years earlier," says Mr Crowley, whose grandmother was Collins' cousin.


"But then we likewise have got 14 and 15 year olds who are huge Collins enthusiasts who can be found in who understand what he had for his last breakfast.


"They throw some really excellent concerns at us."


Thousands to participate in Michael Collins celebration


Collins was a crucial figure in the battle for Irish self-reliance and was director of intelligence of the Irish Republican Army (IRA) throughout the War of Independence with Britain, which lasted from January 1919 till July 1921.


But the terms of the peace treaty with Britain, which he signed, were incredibly questionable and led to a civil war which broke out in June 1922, with the IRA splitting into professional and anti-treaty factions.


Collins was commander-in-chief of the pro-treaty forces, which ended up being the brand-new Irish National Army, but on 22 August 1922 while he was taking a trip through his home county of Cork his convoy was assailed by anti-treaty fighters.


Collins got out of his automobile to eliminate and in the gun fight which followed he was shot dead.


He was 31 years old.


At the time of his death he was chairman of the provisionary federal government of the brand-new Irish Free State, as well as leader of its militaries.


To this day individuals question what may have been if he had actually made it through and gone on to lead the brand-new state.


"People ask would he have attempted to produce a 32 county settlement? Would he have nationalists in the northern state to have been dealt with the way they were?" Mr Crowley states.


"I believe he was the one leader at that time that the proof suggests had genuine interest in the northern circumstance.


"In his mind the treaty was just the start."


He suspects Collins would have been more forceful when it came to the Boundary Commission, which was intended to choose on where the brand-new border in between the Irish Free State and Northern Ireland should lie.


In the end, although the commission recommended small transfers of land in both instructions, its recommendations were never ever carried out and the border stayed the same as it was in 1921.


Lock of Michael Collins' hair to be auctioned


How the Irish Civil War erupted 100 years ago


The civil war left a bitter legacy in Irish society, especially the execution of dozens of anti-treaty fighters by the brand-new provisionary federal government.


The first official executions were brought out in November 1922 and they continued up until May 1923.


But Prof Marie Coleman, teacher of 20th Century Irish history at Queen's University, Belfast, does not think this would have been any different had Collins not been eliminated.


"There has been a lot of speculation that the course of the civil war might have been different, that perhaps the acrimony of the executions might have been various," she says.


"I see absolutely nothing to suggest that Collins would have prosecuted the war any differently.


"Arguably, he had more at stake in safeguarding the treaty settlement due to the fact that he had been a signatory of the treaty.


"He showed nothing in between June and August 1922 to recommend that he would have been any softer on the republican side than Richard Mulcahy was after him."


Collins' killing came simply 10 days after the death of Arthur Griffith - another crucial figure in the defend Irish self-reliance.


Other prominent leaders such as Éamon De Valera were now on the anti-treaty side.


But Prof Coleman states those who filled the vacuum were likewise capable leaders.


"Griffith was changed by WT Cosgrave who was most likely the most knowledgeable political leader in Sinn Féin," she states.


"Collins was replaced by Richard Mulcahy, who had actually been the chief of staff of the IRA during the War of Independence.


"So most likely, in truth, he knew more about running the army than Collins would have done."


There is still no arrangement on who fired the fatal shot that killed Collins, which has actually left space for a variety of theories and conspiracies.


Mr Crowley states the events of Collins' final day are the most popular part of the museum and centre which he runs, with visitors always keen to ask about who was responsible for his death.


"People are captivated by the fact he died the way he did," he states.


"He died a hero's death with a weapon in his hand, you couldn't make it up."


What was the Anglo-Irish Treaty?


The essential figures on complimentary state's road to civil war


On Sunday, Mr Crowley will participate in the main ceremonies and on Monday the centre is running a trip to a number of locations connected with Collins, consisting of the scene of his death at Béal na Bláth where they will hold a minute's silence at the time Collins was shot.


One of the more questionable aspects of Collins' tradition stays the truth he accepted the Anglo-Irish Treaty.


It created the Irish Free State but within the British Empire and with the British King as head of state, who Irish TDs (MPs) were required to swear an oath of loyalty to.


It also verified the partition of Ireland and the development of Northern Ireland.


"Some people say to us that Michael Collins was not a republican politician," Mr Crowley says.


"But I would state he was a practical republican with a plan that could actually prosper.


"He was the sort of leader who just occurs for a nation once in a thousand years."